Sit at your own risk
By Martha McKenzie
That's right. What you are probably doing right now as you read this article may be increasing your risk for developing diseases, including cancer. And you're not alone. Between working at a desk, watching TV, and driving around town, the average American spends more than eight hours a day sitting.
In an earlier study, Patel found that people who sat a lot, particularly women, tended to die earlier. Women who sat for more than six hours a day were 37% more likely to die during the 13 years of the study than those who sat for less than three hours a day. Men who sat more than six hours a day were 18% more likely to die than those who sat less than three hours. She estimates two years of life can be gained by reducing sitting to less than three hours a day.
Surprisingly, this level of risk applied even to people who religiously went to the gym but sat at desk jobs the rest of the day—people Patel likes to call "active couch potatoes."
Studies have shown that sitting for long periods of time, even when combined with meeting public-health guidelines on physical activity, is associated with high blood pressure, elevated lipid levels, chronic inflammation, and abnormal cholesterol—any of which could contribute to an increased cancer risk.
One study has already been published showing an association between the amount of time spent sitting and the risk for multiple myeloma. Another study looking at the association with other forms of cancer is currently being reviewed for publication, so Patel cannot yet discuss those findings.
And even when she can, she will have more questions than answers. "These are observed associations, and there is not yet a full understanding if the culprit is sitting time or if that could be a proxy measure for something else," says Patel. "It may be that sitting time, especially when watching TV, is associated with unhealthy snacking, which is why it is associated with elevated cancer risk. The bottom line is, we are still trying to understand what all of this means."
Patel was drawn to her current line of research by a personal interest. "I was one of those active couch potatoes," says Patel, who is an adjunct faculty member in epidemiology at Rollins. "I went to the gym regularly and did twice as much as the minimum level of recommended physical activity. I ate well. But I had a little weight that I wanted to get off that I simply could not."
So Patel started thinking about how she spent the 15 hours of the day when she wasn't at the gym or sleeping. She got a pedometer and tracked her steps to see if she was getting close to the recommended 10,000 steps a day. She wasn't. When Patel didn't go to the gym, she logged about 1,800 steps a day. "I was shocked," she says. "I had no idea I was that sedentary."
Patel made what she considers minor changes in her day-to-day activities. She continues to watch the same amount of TV, but instead of curling up on the couch, she stands and folds laundry or does small chores as she watches. She got rid of the printer in her office so she walks down the hall anytime she prints anything. She now works at a sit-stand desk and tries to do all her work on her feet. In five months Patel has lost the 20 pounds she had been trying to shed.
"It does not take the place of being physically active, but for the two-thirds of our population who are not meeting physical activity guidelines, there is tremendous public health value in saying, 'If you don't do anything, there is benefit in simply standing up and starting to move,'" says Patel.
Looking ahead
Patel's continuing work on the effects of sitting draws from the vast database of CPS-2, which was actually the third of the American Cancer Society's huge cohort studies on cancer. These studies, which began in 1952 and have enrolled millions of participants, have shaped the public health landscape by tracing the progression of the tobacco epidemic and the emergence of the obesity epidemic in the U.S.
As the principal investigator of CPS-3, Patel will help build the scientific basis for the next generation of cancer control and prevention. The study, which concluded enrollment in December 2013 with just over 304,000 participants, includes a new element—a bio bank to store blood samples from every individual.
"We really want to exploit new technologies and use the blood samples to extend our understanding of what contributes to cancer risk," says Patel. "We are equipped now to look at the genetic contribution to cancer risk, the lifestyle or environmental contribution to cancer risk—including sitting—and now these markers that we can measure through blood and see how they are associated with cancer risk."
The Rollins connectionWhen Alpa Patel goes to her downtown office at the American Cancer Society's epidemiology research program, it's almost like going to a Rollins alumni reunion. Her program, which conducts the ACS's huge cohort studies, has a total staff of 35. Of the nine doctoral-level researchers, two studied at Rollins—Patel and Lauren Teras 00MPH 10PhD. The other doctoral-level staff are all adjunct faculty at Rollins. And of the 16 master's level researchers, eight are from Rollins. "The vast majority of our research staff has some connection to Rollins," says Patel. "Of course, it helps that we are in the same city, but I think it goes beyond that. "The epidemiology program at Rollins offers some of the best epi methods training in the country," she continues. "I think that's a large reason why we have brought on so many. Not only are we local and can collaborate with Rollins, but there is a very strong foundation in research methods that is built into that curriculum, and it has led to a lot of great research done not just at the American Cancer Society, but broadly." |
Related Resources:
"More employees trading chairs for fit-friendly desks" (7/29/2013)